skip navigation

Philosophy of Religion

Following God without Belief: Moral Objections to Agnostic Religious Commitment

By Samantha Corte, 304 Rainbow Drive, Carrboro, NC 27510, USA. (February 2008)

Section: Philosophy of Religion

Subject: Philosophy.

Key Topics: evidence, agency, morality, belief.

Abstract

Since pragmatic arguments for agnostic religious commitment do not require one to believe on insufficient evidence, they avoid one of the moral objections to pragmatic arguments for belief in God: the objection that one should not believe on insufficient evidence. However, I will argue that pragmatic arguments for agnostic religious commitment must deal with two related moral objections. First, if we have a duty to investigate the truth in matters of importance to our behavior, then making such a commitment turns out to conflict to some extent with that duty, though not, I think, to an unacceptable degree. Second, some people have a conception of God and the religious life such that making an agnostic religious commitment may interfere with the person's ability to reflect on moral matters and act on her conclusions, thus putting her at greater risk of doing the wrong thing.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2008.00129.x

This article abstract has been viewed 4762 times.

view cite Add to my Compass

Add to VLE/CMS feedback

Top 5 related articles

[All related articles]

Top 5 Related Blackwell Reference Chapters

[All Related Reference Chapters]

Quick Search

Related Blackwell Reference Chapters

Philosophy Compass - Personal Subscription Rates
Philosophy Compass - The Philosopher's Eye

Sign up for free Philosophy Compass content alerts

Keep up-to-date

"…a leading source for scholarship and a leading resource for student learning."

E Lorkovic

Grant MacEwan College

 
[ access key 0 : accessibility information including access key list ] [ access key 1 : home page ] [ access key 2 : skip navigation] [ access key 6 : help ]