skip navigation

Legal & Political

Are Human Rights Essentially Triggers for Intervention?

By John Tasioulas, University of Oxford (December 2009)


Section: Legal & Political

Subjects: Legal Philosophy, Philosophy, Political Philosophy, Legal and Political.

People: Rawls, John .

Key Topic: rights.

Abstract

The orthodox conception of human rights holds that human rights are moral rights possessed by all human beings simply in virtue of their humanity. In recent years, advocates of a ‘political’ conception of human rights have criticized this view on the grounds that it overlooks the distinctive political function performed by human rights. This article evaluates the arguments of two such critics, John Rawls and Joseph Raz, who characterize the political function of human rights as that of potential triggers for intervention by one society against another.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2009.00246.x

This article abstract has been viewed 1965 times.

view cite Add to my Compass

Add to VLE/CMS feedback


Top 5 related articles

Top 5 Related Blackwell Reference Chapters

Quick Search

Related Blackwell Reference Chapters

Philosophy Compass - Personal Subscription Rates
Philosophy Compass - The Philosopher's Eye
 
[ access key 0 : accessibility information including access key list ] [ access key 1 : home page ] [ access key 2 : skip navigation] [ access key 6 : help ]